My good friend Danny called me out on his blog yesterday over some of the discussions we have from time to time dealing with theological issues. That’s ok, D…I still love ya. MOST of the time, our discussions are good-natured fun (for me, because I get under his skin so much). I love to push buttons…to get people a little riled up. It’s a great way to test people to see if they really understand their own convictions. For Danny and me, it’s very interesting. We both are fairly similar in our own personal theology…some differences here and there, but nothing major. The big difference is in how we form and approach that theology. It’s funny when we get into arguments…both saying the exact same thing essentially, just in very different ways. How insane is it that it is so easy to get caught up in the arguments and not once realize that you’re not really arguing.
Reflecting on these kinds of discussions got me thinking. When is the last time you had a real, meaningful open dialogue with someone over theological issues? I’m not talking about the last time you tried to argue your position against someone else’s because you KNOW you’re right. I’m talking about a real dialogue…one where opposing viewpoints are welcome, where you don’t try to disprove what the other person is saying but rather where you are trying to understand where they are coming from? Instead of asking questions in an attempt to cause them to contradict themselves, you asked questions with pure motives of understanding.
It’s no secret that I’m a fan of these dialogues. I try to have them every chance I get…but it becomes increasingly difficult in today’s society. We have way too many people, Christian and non-Christian alike, who so adamently stand behind their own convictions that they refuse to even listen to anyone else. I’m not saying we have to agree, but at least lets be civil about it.
Let me give you an example. I have grown up Southern Baptist and considered myself to be fairly conservative in my theology (others may argue, but that’s another topic). My theology holds true to the majority of other Southern Baptists, and I remain a SB at heart today. I do, however, have many Presbyterian friends. While in college at Anderson University in Anderson, SC, I had a very meaningful discussion with one of these friends over Calvinism.
Now, I’m no Calvinist. And this is a hot topic even now among Christians. So my buddy, Stev-o, and I began a dialogue in the library one afternoon (the fact that I was even in a library is a miracle in itself). Being a Presbyterian at a Baptist institution had taught Stev-o one thing: Baptists are pig-headed. He was constantly being “evangelized” by my other Baptist bretheren…argued with, proved wrong (in their eyes), and ridiculed for his belief. Understand, Stev-o has more Biblical knowledge in his little finger than I could ever dream to have. He’s an outright genius (and a pretty good drummer too). But he had come to the conclusion that all we ever did was try to prove that our Baptist theology was right and everyone else was wrong.
Stev-o and I had been friends for a while. So I wasn’t at all intimidated by having this conversation. I was not approaching him in order to convert him. I simply asked him to explain his belief to me. You see, countless people had told me that Calvinism was wrong, but nobody could ever really tell me why. The truth was, most people I knew didn’t really know that much about it. They had learned the acronym TULIP, but that’s about it.
So Stev-o and I had casual conversation about it. I asked questions, he provided answers. He explained his worldview, and I listened. Did I agree with him? On some points, yes. On others…absolutely not. But did I try and correct him? No. He was polite, patient, provided scriptural basis for his beliefs, and that’s more than I can say for most Christians I know. After I had gotten a pretty good understanding of his point of view, he was open to hearing mine…and my own objections to some of his beliefs (note: not trying to prove that he is wrong, but more explaining why I do not agree with a certain point.)
Stev-o and I have had many such conversations since. Has he converted me or I him? Nope. But because of that first conversation we had, we can continue to explore these differences without fear. We are still great friends who agree to disagree.
So what did I learn from this? It’s ok to listen. It’s ok to be challenged. Maybe if we do less arguing and more listening, we could focus on the things that are really important…like..um…i dunno….impacting a lost world.